|


Register
to Vote

Letters to
the Editor
Talking
Points
Prop. 107
Flyers
1-4
5 Reasons to
Reject Prop 107
How the Yes on Prop 107 Side Gets
it Wrong on Higher Education
Students Helping
Assure Racial
Equality, Justice
and Diversity
Shelton: UA
Committed to
Diversity
No: Prop 107 would
harm Arizonans and deny opportunities
CAVEAT LECTOR (Reader Beware)
It is not enough to
target immigrants,
now the state goes
after all minorities
|
THE ELIMINATION
OF RACIAL IDENTITY
In 1997, Ward
Connerly began an alliance with prominent members of what
has become known as the multiracial movement. Connerly
forged ties with the publishers of Interracial Voice and The
Multiracial activist, publications for the movement.
Eventually, Connerly enlisted the help of several outspoken
members to assist with the execution of the Racial Privacy
Initiative (RPI).1
The Racial Privacy Initiative
(Color Me Gone)
| The state shall not classify any individual
by race, ethnicity, color or national origin in
the operation of education, public contracting
or public employment. Classification in
other state operations are prohibited unless
they serve a compelling state interest and are
approved by two-thirds majority of the
legislature and approved by the governor. |
Ward
Connerly's RPI would bar the collection by states of racial
and ethnic data. "Our emphasis is really on trying to
get the nation to think less about the issue of race.
It's an obsession with our country . . . we're going to have
to get rid of the government even asking people to make a
declaration about their race . . . these racial categories
don't make any sense."2
A RPI would
hide racial differences in health care, education, and
disease, making it harder to hold discriminatory
organizations and institutions responsible for their deeds.
Studies on racial profiling, disparate medical treatment for
people of color, minority rates of incarceration, racial
composition of juries, pass/fail rates for students of
different races, racial composition of juries, loan approval
rates for minorities -- knowing all this and more would be
forbidden. A "color-blind" society would be achieved
by blinding citizens and government to the facts of bias.
Racial peace will reign in the land, they theory goes, since
there will be no official racist facts available to argue
about.3
All private and public agencies would be allowed to engage
in racist practices without fear of state
information-gathering used to track discrimination.
The RPI was put on the ballot in California in 2003 and
failed. It is the multiracial movement's task to be
Connerly's cheerleaders and keep the initiative alive.
Connerly, imbued with deceptive promises of "eliminating
racial discrimination," is determined to bring it back.
www.blackcommentator.com/52/52_connerly.html
|
Proposition 107
would prohibit recordkeeping and data collection in
education on the basis of genera and race. Thereby
eliminating evidence typically used to demonstrate
discrimination, patterns and practices of discrimination. |
Equal
opportunity isn’t Connerly’s only target. In a quote
appearing in the San Francisco Examiner, Connerly said that
he wasn’t convinced ethnic studies reflected “a sound
academic curriculum rather than the political correctness
mind set.” In the same article he called for a review of
“all of the infrastructure created back in the 1970s and
‘80s as a result of black nationalism and the black power
movement.
_______________________________
1California
Proposition 54 (2003),
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_54_2003
2Diversity Inc,
http://www.diversityinc.com/content/1757/article/7536
3The Black Commentator,
http://www.blackcommentator.com/52/52_connerly_pf.html
Back to Proposition 107
Conspiracy Page
|
|